#clojure log - Jun 28 2009

The Joy of Clojure
Main Clojure site
Google Group
List of all logged dates

0:27 replaca: good evening, anyone who's here

0:28 duck1123: evening replaca

0:28 replaca: quiet night, eh?

0:28 duck1123: seems so

0:48 agc: heh i just was reading the mailing list, did anyone else see that guy who was worried that the site was down?

0:49 to bad Rich squashed it, that was pretty entertaining :P

0:51 duck1123: Like I just dented, I like rich because he's not afraid to lay the smack down when he feels it's deserved

0:53 of course I had a response I was working on about how just about any website is theoretically vulnerable to tampering by someone higher up the chain

0:55 unless you're a direct node that you're personally guarding and using dns-sec someone could do something

0:55 agc: yeah the kid clearly doesn't understand the notion of hosting

0:56 pretty funny to watch though

0:58 duck1123: yes it sucks that wikispaces went down for maintenance, no that doesn't mean they're going to decide to replace the api page with "forget Clojure, use Perl"

0:59 agc: but but... what if they're out to get us?

1:00 duck1123: although I think it would be cool if clojure.org was re-written to use compojure or some such

1:00 as an example of eating your own dog food

1:00 agc: its the first rule of web survival, never trust your host

1:00 yeah that'd be cool

1:02 duck1123: truthfully, it probably wouldn't be all that hard considering at the moment it's all static content

1:02 agc: thats probably why it hasn't been done yet, there just not much point

1:08 replaca: I just read that one. I was very amused - pretty good trolling

1:09 I think that the web hosting of the API doc is pretty much Clojure's most important problem

1:10 I have been working this week on moving the contrib-autodoc over to github pages and I am "eating" our own dog food by using enlive to do "templating"

2:59 danlucraft: ,(doc dotimes)

2:59 (doc dotimes)

3:00 why does clojurebot not do my bidding?

3:00 ,(dotimes [_ 3] (print "ho! "))

3:01 kotarak: no clojurebot here, at the moment

3:01 danlucraft: nope

3:01 sleeping, probably

3:24 in the docs for dotimes, 'bindings' refers to a vector of name value pairs.

3:24 is this always what bindings means?

3:35 cmvkk: almost definitely.

6:30 agc: anyone around who I can ask about translating docs to another language?

6:31 Lau_of_DK: If its for your own pleasure, I think Google has a good enough translation service

6:32 agc: no english is fine with me, but I was just wondering if there was any attempts to translate the docs to other languages because I might be interested in doing some of that

6:34 hmm this is weird Clozure CL, http://trac.clozure.com/openmcl

6:36 danlei: what's weird about it?

6:52 agc: clozure, clojure ...not very original of them

6:54 danlei: Clozure Associates is around since 2000 ...

7:37 agc: I dont think they were always called clozure though, the mailing list is called openmcl-devel and yes it does go back to 2001

7:38 anyway I dont know anything about it, just thought it might be a new lisp project calling themselves clozure but I guess not

7:48 danlei: they renamed openmcl, because mcl itself was opensourced. besides matching "Clozure Associates", in choosing "Clozure CL" they achieved some continuity with the pre-mcl era, when it was called "Coral Common Lisp". (both are "CCL") anyway, no point in accusing them of plagiarism.

7:53 Lau_of_DK: Does anyone have a clue what this is ?

7:53 Can't embed object in code, maybe print-dup not defined: com.jcraft.jsch.Session@908f05

7:56 danlei: (clozure.com/about.html: "Clozure Associates was founded in 2000 by ...")

7:57 Lau_of_DK: Common Lispers...

7:58 danlei: hm?

8:02 Lau_of_DK: Clozure... CL experts

8:04 krumholt_: clozure is the new name for openMCL. clozure was macComonLisp. when they went open-source there allready was an openMCL so they renamed it clozure

8:05 danlei: exactly. my point was, that the "Clozure Associates", after which openmcl was renamed have been around since almost 10 years. (in re to: "clozure, clojure ...not very original of them")

8:06 anyway, it's just an obvious naming choice for some lisp :)

8:10 hm ...

8:11 somewhere I read about inclusion of something akin to #+/#- reader macros

8:14 can't find anything in clojure.org/reader though. is there a way to comment out a sexpr, like #+nil(...)?

8:18 Chousuke: danlei: change the operator to comment?

8:20 Chouser: danlei: #_

8:22 danlei: Chouser: yes, thank you! (should maybe be added to clojure.org/reader)

8:25 * danlei continues that monad tutorial

8:26 Chousuke: The api docs ought to be somehow autogenerated from git :/

8:26 that would require a few additional files for the non-docstring documentation pages though.

8:33 danlei: if I have two namespaces t1 and t2, and have referred t1 from t2, is there a way to "un-refer"?

8:35 hoeck: danlei: there is ns-unmap

8:35 danlei: hm, ok

8:35 a sec

8:37 lisppaste8: danlei pasted "unrefer" at http://paste.lisp.org/display/82641

8:38 danlei: I find it sometimes handy for repl use

8:39 something like this in c.c. already?

8:50 hoeck: danlei: there is ns-utils in contrib, but without unrefer

8:52 danlei: hoeck: do you know how to apply for inclusion in c.c.?

8:53 Chousuke: first you need a CA

8:54 danlei: hm, for such a little thing. couldn't someone else commit it (if there's interest)?

8:55 Chousuke: you still need a CA so that rhickey has joint copyright.

8:55 danlei: hm I see

8:55 Chousuke: since stuff from contrib occasionally gets promoted to core.

8:56 danlei: ok, thanks

8:56 Chousuke: the CA system does get in the way of small contributions sometimes, but it's a one time thing :)

8:56 danlei: if there will be some more things I find worthy, I'll do the CA agreement

8:57 Chousuke: sometimes copyright just gets in the way of code sharing :P

8:58 danlei: don't know how to say it in english "mit sowas kann man mich jagen" "you can hunt me with things like this" :)

8:59 Chousuke: I wonder if there's any precedent regarding copyrightability of trivial code snippets

10:16 AWizzArd: BS argumentation, again (sigh), that Clojure is not a real Lisp: http://www.loper-os.org/?p=42

10:16 Chousuke: oh, that. yeah.

10:17 AWizzArd: The dead body is still twitching ;-)

10:19 Chousuke: He can talk about dreams all he wants. Someone else goes ahead and implements something that brings the world closer to that dream.

10:20 Clojure may not be the "optimal lisp" but it really is the most fun language I have used so far, even with all its "faults" :P

10:21 duck1123: I can't help but wonder if he would be happier if Clojure could compile itself.

10:22 Chousuke: Well, that's on the todo list :P

10:22 duck1123: I know

10:24 best review of that post: "emacsen: This statement summarizes the insane Lisper mindset, I don’t care if everybody really is more productive in Clojure than in Common Lisp." - http://identi.ca/notice/5785065

10:26 AWizzArd: duck1123: one point of criticism in that virtual argument is, that the current Clojure implementation depends on weaknesses of its underlying VM.

10:26 For example: no tagged numbers, no TC optimization, etc.

10:27 Of course those are no real arguments in Clojure not being a Lisp.

10:30 duck1123: a true moddern lisp machine would be a cool thing to have

10:32 AWizzArd: Why?

10:32 cp2: why not

10:32 AWizzArd: Just for hobby interests?

10:32 cp2: The burden of argumentation is on the one who makes claims.

10:33 cp2: AWizzArd: ah, but i didnt make that claim =P

10:33 AWizzArd: true

10:33 cp2: heh

10:33 regardless though

10:33 duck1123: it would be cool to be able to control every aspect of the os from a repl

10:33 cp2: yeah, definitely hobby related stuff

10:33 danlei: if it would be "true modern", I agree (judging from what I've seen running Medley in a VM). something like a lisp-squeak (but more geared towards programmers, than children) would be very nice, too.

10:34 cp2: i would just want one to have as another geek toy

10:34 AWizzArd: One problem with "why questions" is that they can easily be mistaken for being criticism. I am just interested to hear some arguments and don't want to criticize that idea in any way.

10:34 duck1123: I wish there was a clojure equivalent of stumpwm

10:34 cp2: duck1123: make one

10:35 duck1123: I couldn't find any decent java-based windows managers to base off of

10:35 Raynes: "You’re looking at it wrong. It’s not meant to be a serious Lisp. It’s only cosmetically descended from McCarthy’s original idea. It’s an attempt to terraform the wasteland of the JVM. It fails, of course, but it does make it at least somewhat less likely that geysers of molten arsenic will pour through your floor at 1AM."

10:35 danlei: turtles, all the way down? ability to modify everything in one language, and, that language being lisp, one, that is in itself somehow the creme de la creme. integration.

10:35 cp2: so base it off of stumpwm

10:35 well, er, not _exactly_

10:36 you could mimic the way it does things

10:36 duck1123: I've thought about it. I've got too much else on my plate atm however

10:37 cp2: yeah, pretty much the same story for me

10:37 ive found loads of cool stuff i wanna do

10:37 Raynes: duck1123: It amazes me how much you look like Richard Karn in your Twitter picture.

10:37 cp2: but

10:37 i have a queue of other things to plow through

10:39 duck1123: lol, I had a little girl at the beach think I was Billy Mays

10:39 Raynes: I've sadly not really done anything with Clojure for a long while. I've been on a Haskell learning expedition, and probably will be for a few more weeks before coming back and continuing my Clojure adventures.

10:43 duck1123: so is anyone here a serious user of clj-record? I want to get some feedback on some of the changes I pushed to my fork.

11:32 Chouser: durka42: I've got a friend interested writing a window manager in Clojure

11:33 I don't know how much code he's got, but I think he's got some JNA doing X11 stuff

11:39 Jomyoot: does clojure support imperative programming too?

11:39 or is it strictly functional

11:39 CL allows sequential/imperative

11:40 danlei: it's not strict, albeit more inclined to FP than CL

11:40 Chouser: Jomyoot: it doesn't prevent you from writing and using functions with side-effects, but it's likely to feel like you're working against the grain.

11:40 locals are immutable -- that gets in the way of a lot of imperative idioms

11:40 Jomyoot: well

11:41 what about globals?

11:41 would scala allow more imperatives then?

11:42 Chouser: globals can be changed, though it's not common to do so as part of an algorithm.

11:42 scala supports mutable locals (when you use "var" rather than "val")

11:43 ...though when I asked for help in #scala with code that used "var" I was frequently mocked. :-/

11:43 durka42: Chouser: sounds interesting

11:43 Jomyoot: do you think 1 year from now. clojure or scala will have more programmers?

11:44 AWizzArd: Does not matter I think.

11:44 Jomyoot: i am hoping for a webframework

11:44 like rails or django for clojure

11:44 scala has lift already

11:44 AWizzArd: Clojure has Compojure. But why hoping and not joining that project?

11:45 Jomyoot: dunno

11:45 not enough time to contribue to a framework really

11:45 i am more of a user

11:45 AWizzArd: But what do you do in the time while the framework is not available? :)

11:46 Jomyoot: use different langauge? like ruby?

11:46 i was coding CL a while back

11:46 scheme too

11:47 then switched to ruby for a web project

11:47 i tried haskell

11:48 but killed myself with monads

11:48 i hope clojure does not have monads

11:48 * danlei just reads about them :)

11:48 danlei: it does, but not in core

11:48 you're not forced to use them in any way

11:50 concerning your question about globals: just yesterday I wrote a little parser for ansi-sequences, which used a kind of mutable global (an atom), then chosuke provided a stateless alternative.

11:50 so, in general, you're not forced.

11:51 Chousuke: I thought about writing a version of the parser using the state monad from contrib

11:51 danlei: would be a nice read

11:51 I've just finished the tutorial, but I'll have to read some more, and re-read it again

11:51 think I've a grasp at the basics now

12:02 hm ... (read) freezes my slime repl

12:03 rhickey: type a form

12:03 danlei: =)

12:03 I did :)

12:03 rhickey: hrm

12:03 danlei: updated slime yesterday, swank-clojure is up-to-date

12:03 connected via swank-server

12:04 Chousuke: danlei: too bad I have no idea how to actually use the monad library :P

12:04 danlei: Chousuke: :)

12:05 Chousuke: just wanted to ask you for a simple example: (inc (read)), how to isolate the read ;)

12:05 StartsWithK: rhickey: will there be a backport to 1.0.x series of clojure.test (with downloadable clojure-1.0.x.zip on the site)?

12:06 rhickey: StartsWithK: dunno, someone has to volunteer to do it

12:06 strictly speaking that's not a .x change, as it is more than a bugfix

12:07 StartsWithK: i would like to ditch the clj-unit fork included in cloak (that clojure build system) for this new one

12:07 just to get with the program :)

12:15 any one experimented with using java agent to manipulate bytecode at runtime in context of changing existing clojure code?

12:15 or to inject IMeta to java.lang.String and such..

12:16 Chousuke: hopeless

12:16 I know what I want to use for my state but I have no clue how to actually use the state monad to do the state-keeping :(

12:17 StartsWithK: i got the impression final classes are not a problem for instrumentation mechanism

12:18 and by manipulationg clojure.core/+ threre would be no need for contrib.generic, and as i read it, no speed penalty eather

12:24 Chousuke: danlei: if you figure out how to use the state monad with the parser thingy, tell me.

12:24 I can't.

12:24 danlei: Chousuke: I will (if I ever do) :)

12:26 Chousuke: it'd probably be easier to see how the types interact if clojure had static typing.

12:26 but as it is now, I just can't tell whether I'm supposed to have a monadic function, a monadic value, or the regular ones

12:27 or if I try reading the code that uses monads in contrib... it looks neat and cool, but I have no clue how it works

12:27 danlei: atm, I'm just reading the examples.clj of c.c.monads, and trying to find some more tutorials

12:28 * danlei neither, really

12:28 Chousuke: I have read at least five different monad tutorials :P

12:28 it doesn't help

12:28 it looks simple in the examples, but there's nothing to bridge that so that I could produce monadic code myseld.

12:28 myself*

12:30 danlei: I don't even know how to isolate input. In haskell those things are IO <something>, if I remember correctly, but I wouldn't know how to do such a ting in clojure.

12:30 *thing

12:30 Chousuke: it's nothing explicit.

12:31 in your earlier example, (inc (read)) is probably not what you want. I suspect you're going to do more with the return value of (read) than just increment it?

12:31 danlei: say, I have (inc (read)) inc is pure, read is inherently not. if one of the goals of monads are to separate pure and impure code, how would I do that?

12:31 it's just an example

12:32 read something, which is impure, and increment it, which is a pure function

12:32 Chousuke: so, make a function that does all that with a non-read value, then call (do-complicated-stuff (read))

12:32 danlei: well, that's how I would do it without monads ...

12:32 Chousuke: in essence, the points where you use impure functions should be well-defined and visible and few in number :)

12:33 there's no need to use monads.

12:33 danlei: no, need, yes, but I thought those monads were supposed to help me in the process, aren't they?

12:33 Chousuke: well, yeah, if you know how to use them

12:33 danlei: that's the point, I guess :)

12:33 Chousuke: I prefer just using discipline, because I have no clue about monads :P

12:34 danlei: atm my sime REPL is more effective than any monad: prevents every use of (read) :)

12:34 Chousuke: heh

12:55 opqdonut: danlei: mapping pure functions over an impure "action" is one of the basic monad operations

12:56 let me check the syntax c.c.monad uses

12:56 (i come from haskell and haven't tried monads in clojure yet=

12:56 *)

12:56 danlei: opqdonut: thanks

12:57 Chousuke: c.c.monads has domonad but I can't figure out how it works

12:57 or how to define a function that works the way I want ;/

12:58 danlei: (domonad maybe-m [x 1 y nil] (+ x y)) -> nil

12:58 that's how far I've come ;)

12:59 opqdonut: danlei: mlift

12:59 is the thing you are looking for

12:59 er, m-lift

12:59 danlei: opqdonut: could you give a little example as to how to use it to separate, say, IO functions from pure ones?

13:01 Chousuke: I doubt m-lift is useful with the state monad

13:01 opqdonut: it's useful with every monad

13:01 it's the shortest way of applying a pure computation to a monadic value

13:02 Chousuke: how would I define a function that takes in a piece of input and uses the state monad to produce a new value and a state?

13:02 Lau_of_DK: Seen clojurebot?

13:02 danlei: yes, I too would like to see an example of such a simple ting

13:02 *thing

13:02 Lau_of_DK: he's monadic these days?

13:03 Lau_of_DK: monadic?

13:03 opqdonut: i'm sorry, I can't really supply examples in clojure syntax

13:03 danlei: Lau_of_DK: monads are used to implement clojurebot?

13:03 Lau_of_DK: I didnt know - but what does it matter? Are monads prone to FAIL ?

13:03 Chousuke: opqdonut: haskell works too

13:04 danlei: Lau_of_DK: :) misread you ;)

13:04 Lau_of_DK: Ok

13:04 Chousuke: the domonad syntax in clojure is similar to haskell's do block

13:04 but I can't figure out which function takes what parameter and how to get to them

13:04 opqdonut: Chousuke: so you want val->(state,val) wihtout taking in any state

13:04 that's not really monadic at all

13:05 Chousuke: no, I want a monadic function that "implicitly" takes the state argument

13:05 opqdonut: yes, yes

13:05 so you'd say (for example) "add_state_to x = do s <- get; return (x + s)"

13:06 that's a function that takes one parameter, and adds the state to it

13:06 (get returns the current state)

13:06 i'm guessing you'd use defmonadfn in clojure

13:07 Chousuke: x is a monadic value?

13:07 * danlei thinks ... and that's an /easy/ example

13:07 Chousuke: what if I had some input that I want to add to the state, depending on what the state is.

13:10 danlei: Chousuke: do I understand right, that what you describe would be the function itself as a monadic thing, which has the state passed implicitly to it? (my head spins a little)

13:11 Chousuke: danlei: a monadic value in the state monad is a function that takes the state as its parameter. that much I know

13:11 danlei: and its value is the computation?

13:11 Chousuke: but I just can't wrap my head around how to actually use that to work with the state and the actual final return value

13:15 danlei: "a state monad value is a function that takes a single argument, the current state of the computation, and returns a vector of length two containing the result of the computation and the updated state after the computation" I guess, so far I understood too.

13:22 Chouser: is it just me, or is the g.group a bit more ...tense... laterly.

13:23 lately?

13:23 Chousuke: hmm

13:23 opqdonut: Chousuke: x is non-monadic ther

13:23 e

13:23 Chousuke: I'm having easier time writing out the monad functions explicitly rather than by using domonad :P

13:23 opqdonut: because bind takes care of unwrapping it when we want to use f

13:24 Chousuke: that's a good thing :)

13:44 Chousuke: hmm

13:44 now I have something monadic here

13:45 now I need to figure out how to apply that to a sequence

13:48 prospero_: so hypothetically, let's say I want to write a macro that reverses the names of keywords

13:48 like so: (defmacro reverse-keyword [k] (keyword (apply str (reverse (name k)))))

13:49 (reverse-keyword :hello) yields :olleh

13:49 but (map #(reverse-keyword %) [:a :b]) yields (:34__1p :34__1p)

13:50 what's going on underneath the covers here?

13:51 Chouser: prospero_: try: (macroexpand '#(reverse-keyword %))

13:52 prospero_: ha, fair enough

13:52 Chouser: it's a macro, so it does what it does at compile time, before the values for % are known

13:53 prospero_: ok, that makes sense

13:56 so if I want to do a transform over a list of args inside a macro

13:57 is it just that I shouldn't use anonymous functions?

13:57 or is there some deeper limitation at play here?

14:02 achim: prospero: macros are a special kind of functions that transform syntax prior to compilation. contrary to ordinary functions, they take their arguments unevaluated. so your macro tries to reverse %, basically

14:03 prospero_: achim: I get that part, I was just having trouble finding an example that walks a list of args, rather than making a single transformation

14:03 I'm looking at the code for "cond" now, which seems to be what I'm looking for

14:04 sorry if I was unclear what I was looking for

14:05 Chousuke: prospero_: you can use a function to do the reversing

14:06 just defn reverse-keyword instead of defmacroing it

14:06 prospero_: Chousuke: yeah, that was just meant to be a toy example

14:06 Chousuke: you can still use it inside a macro

14:07 prospero_: what I'm trying to actually do isn't defn-able, but I didn't want to actually go into the specifics

14:07 probably could have come up with a less trivial example, though

14:07 opqdonut: prospero_: so was cond what you were looking for?

14:08 prospero_: opqdonut: it appears to be

14:08 it applies itself recursively over a list of clauses

14:10 so it will expand the entire list, which of course the anonymous function wouldn't

14:10 if it doesn't work, I'll be back with more questions

14:12 Chousuke: prospero_: can't you do that with a function called from a macro.

14:13 prospero_: Chousuke: here's the macro I'm trying to apply to the args. am I missing something and it can actually be a function?

14:13 (defmacro to-gl-const [k] (let [gl# ("GL_" (.. (name k) (replace \- \_) (toUpperCase)))] `(. GL ~(symbol gl#))))

14:13 Chousuke: hm

14:13 sure it can

14:14 prospero_: calls to "symbol" inside a function were giving me strange errors

14:14 so I assumed that was only something I should do inside a macro

14:16 Chousuke: what's the "GL_" supposed to be though?

14:16 that gives an error

14:16 just wrap it in an str? :)

14:18 prospero_: so this function is meant to translate :this-is-a-keyword to GL_THIS_IS_A_KEYWORD, which is a static constant in javax.media.opengl.GL

14:19 oh, sorry

14:19 I gave you a bad copy-paste of that

14:20 took me a moment to see that

14:20 yeah, it's supposed to be (str "GL_" ...

14:20 Chousuke: http://gist.github.com/137331

14:21 prospero_: I didn't know you could use the template syntax outside of macros

14:21 interesting

14:21 Chousuke: it's just a different kind of quote

14:21 you can use it anywhere.

14:22 prospero_: hm

14:22 Chousuke: conversely, you don't have to use ` in macros either.

14:22 it's just a convenient way to construct a list

14:22 which is what a macro usually returns

14:23 _hrrld: Is there anything like 'drop-nth'? like (drop-nth 1 [0 1 2]) ;;>> [0 2]

14:23 prospero_: Chousuke: thanks, that's really helpful

14:26 Chouser: _hrrld: lazy, linear time thing?

14:26 _hrrld: I'm working with all concrete sequences that are pretty short. I imagine doing drop-nth in a general way efficently could be very difficult.

14:26 opqdonut: not really

14:26 _hrrld: My datasets are small enough that perf isn't a big deal.

14:26 opqdonut: for lazy sequences it's quite easy

14:28 hoeck: _hrrld: there is partition: (map first (partition 2 '(1 2 3 4)))

14:29 _hrrld: hoeck: that returns (1 3) ; the 4 got lost. :)

14:31 Chouser: (defn drop-nth [i coll] (concat (take i coll) (drop (inc i) coll)))

14:31 hoeck: oh, I supposed you wanted to drop every nth of a seq

14:32 _hrrld: Chouser: nice. Much appreciated.

14:33 hoeck: for vectors, you could use subvec and conj them together

14:40 Chouser: hoeck: yes, though I don't think that'd be much of a win. In order to construct the final vector, I think both subvec's would have to be walked linearly anyway.

14:42 hoeck: wouldn't only the second subvector conj'ed on the first one?

14:43 but this is no win either, when dropping the first of a lot of values

14:44 I once had a usecase for dropping values from vectors, but then realized that I'm better off with using hashmaps instead

14:49 Chouser: hoeck: ah, you're right. The first part of the vector would be re-used without a linear copy.

14:49 subvec's smarter there than I thought.

15:02 duck1123_: I'm curious. If I had a lazy-seq that used a fn to generate the rest part, and I started going through that seq and in a different thread re-defed the fn, would the seq start producing the results of the new fn, or does it hold on to the definition of the fn it had originally

15:03 Chousuke: hmm

15:04 duck1123_: I suppose I could test it, it was just a thought that struck me as i was reading the list? => false thread

15:05 Chousuke: ,(let [a (iterate inc 0) b (dorun (take 10 a))] [a (binding [inc dec] (dorun (drop 10 (take 20 a))))])

15:05 oh damn

15:06 hm, not a, b :P

15:07 also, doall :P

15:07 but doesn't look like it has an effect.

15:09 however, (let [a (iterate #'inc 0) b (doall (take 10 a))] [b (binding [inc dec] (doall (drop 10 (take 20 a))))]) does yield [(0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9) (8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1)] :)

15:16 achim: lazy-seq creates a closure from its body, so thread-local bindings should do no harm

15:17 (binding [inc dec] (apply inc [1])) -> 0

15:17 vs (binding [inc dec] (apply #(inc %) [1])) -> 2

15:18 ("apply" to avoid inlining)

15:22 Chousuke: right.

15:22 and adding the var indirection with #' makes the binding work again.

15:23 hmm

15:23 Atom doesn't implement IFn like the other ref types :/

15:23 apparently agent doesn't either.

16:49 Lau_of_DK: So - Have everybody checked out the two demos for ClojureQL yet?

16:52 duck1123: where?

16:52 Lau_of_DK: http://github.com/Lau-of-DK/clojureql/tree/master

16:53 We're coming close to release 1.0, so feel free to throw feature-requests/bug-reports at us!

16:57 duck1123: Lau_of_DK: does clojureql handle limiting?

16:58 Lau_of_DK: I have a patch in my inbox from eyeris for offset/limit support, I'm looking at that now

16:58 duck1123: I recently got done hacking up a :limit param for clj-record, and got annoyed that derby doesn't support limit

16:59 kotarak: Wouldn't take work in the resultset-seq?

16:59 duck1123: yes, but that is potentially wasteful

17:00 Chousuke: Lau_of_DK: order-by and having etc. being functions of queries is really neat.

17:00 duck1123: it's better to let the db limit it to only what you need than to send it all and then filter it

17:01 lisppaste8: drewr pasted "delim-seq" at http://paste.lisp.org/display/82652

17:03 Lau_of_DK: Chousuke: I'm glad you like it

17:07 I've tested superficially, but it seems that drop/take it a feasible replacement for offset/limit

17:09 agc: can anyone give me a brief description of the eclipse public license, how is it different than gpl?

17:10 I'm familiar with gpl/lgpl/bsd is it like any of those?

17:12 duck1123: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_Public_License#Other_aspects is a good description of the difference

17:12 agc: thanks duck1123

17:12 Lau_of_DK: duck1123: Potentially wasteful ?

17:13 kotarak: Lau_of_DK: the drop issue

17:13 Lau_of_DK: kotarak: I wanted duck's thoughts, he sounded like he had some knowledge :)

17:14 duck1123: If I want to start at record 1001, I still have to send those other 1000 records over the wire

17:14 Lau_of_DK: Ok, so same issue as we discussed

17:14 I'm wondering about take, if it realizes the whole set

17:14 I think we might actually get that one for free

17:15 duck1123: I still think that chunked seqs will be awesome for db work

17:15 Lau_of_DK: Why?

17:16 duck1123: I'm still a little fuzzy on the details of chunked seqs, but it sounds like we'll be able to pull a chunk of records down, and then pull more when we get to them

17:16 hoeck: duck1123: yeah, especially if one can implement a chunked-resultset-seq

17:16 duck1123: if it's done the right way underneath that is

17:17 it was the first thing I thought of when I first heard rich talking about them

17:18 Lau_of_DK: I still dont get them :)

17:18 agc: hmm EPL seems a bit strange to me, allowing people to freely take the code and then create additions and release them under a different license even closed source

17:18 Chousuke: duck1123: you can do that with current seqs. it's just that they won't be able to benefit from the "chunky" internal representation

17:20 duck1123: I've been thinking about putting a :page param into my clj-record work so I could specify a page size in the model intl and then say (find-records {:user 4} :page 3)

17:20 Chousuke: duck1123: the point of chunked seqs is to allow seq consuming/producing functions to work on chunks if the internal representation is chunked (like with vectors) and minimise the laziness overhead

17:21 agc: I guess I just don't get the whole licensing thing, I mean if you're bascially letting people do whatever they want then why license it anyway, why not just put it out there and say "do whatever".

17:21 duck1123: agc: I think it's so I can't make the claim that Clojure is mine

17:22 Chouser: agc: one reason is because "whatever" could possibly include copyrighting your work and then suing you if you try to use it yourself. :-P

17:22 agc: ah yeah, that would be an unfortunate way to end up in prison

17:22 Chouser: yes, would be annoying

17:23 duck1123: that's it. Rich is no longer allowed to use Clojure unless he pays me

17:23 agc: you're a bad duck

17:24 duck1123: okay, I'll let him slide this time, but I could really use the money

17:44 eevar: anyone know if the master branches of clojure, contrib and swank are stable and working together right now?

17:45 s/stable/usable for non-critical work/

17:54 Chouser: eevar: I don't use swank, but I think I'd have heard if it wasn't working right now.

17:55 dmiller2718: ,[ (:tag ^#'next) (:tag ^#'print-method)]

17:57 weissj: is the clojurebot that runs in this channel available as code to run elsewhere? hiredman's http://github.com/hiredman/clojurebot/tree/master doesn't look intended to be run by others, the #clojure channel is hardcoded in it

17:58 dmiller2718: evaluates to [clojure.lang.ISeq clojure.lang.MultiFn]

17:59 :tag metadata on #'next being ISeq is reasonable, :tag on #'print-method being MultiFn seems not correct.

17:59 As an IFn value, #'print-method's :tag should be its return type, which is not a MultiFn.

18:00 This is true of anything defined by defmulti. Is this correct?

18:01 Chousuke: weissj: hm, the channel shouldn't be hardcoded :/

18:02 weissj: though I don't know hwat changes hiredman has done since my edits :P

18:02 weissj: anyway, no, that's the original source :)

18:03 weissj: Chousuke: can you tell me how to get it running? i got the pircbot and clojure-json libs on the classpath, and i disabled a bunch of modules that were preventing it from starting

18:03 but it still doesn't work

18:03 i get java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No method in multimethod 'new-send-out' for dispatch value: class clojure.lang.PersistentArrayMap

18:03 Chousuke: weissj: did you look at clojurebot.clj?

18:03 weissj: yes

18:04 i set the bot-attibutes, i can actually see clojurebot join my channel

18:04 but every time i talk to him he throws the above exception

18:04 Chousuke: hm

18:05 that's something I have no idea about :P

18:05 ask hiredman

18:06 most likely he has defined the multimethod in a repl and forgotten it from the sources :)

18:06 weissj: hehe

18:06 ok so there probably aren't too many people running this bot then :)

18:06 Chousuke: probably. :P

18:09 weissj: hehe "suffusion of yellow" - nice Douglas Adams reference there

18:10 Chousuke: hm, there's a defmethod for PersistentHashMap

18:10 maybe it should be clojure.lang.IPersistentMap instead

18:11 try making that edit (in clojurebot/core.clj) and see if it works then

18:11 weissj: well i suppse i could change it

18:11 k

18:14 Chousuke: cool that seems to have worked, although, it won't eval things that start with ,

18:14 what are some other functions i can try

18:17 Chousuke: weissj: you can tell it things

18:17 botnick: foo is bar

18:18 and then try ~foo

18:20 weissj: ah ok

18:20 i got the sandbox working, i didn't konw "sb" was the sandbox module and had removed it :)

18:21 ,(defn add5 [x] (+ x 5))

18:21 oh it's not running in this chan today hehe

18:23 Chousuke: defn won't work anyway :)

18:24 weissj: Chousuke: any particular reason why that's disabled?

18:25 is each expression eval'd in a different space?

18:25 i would think that would be a useful feature to define functions and call them

18:27 Chousuke: weissj: to prevent a DoS

18:28 if you want to disable the protection (which is probably circumventable in any case), take a look at the defang function :P

18:29 weissj: Chousuke: i'll just make *bad-forms* an empty list and see what happens :)

18:29 Chousuke: heh

18:30 you'll probably want to make it an empty *set* though.

18:30 weissj: sorry, set

18:30 (def *bad-forms* #{})

18:31 will get kinda ugly having to define functions on one line though

19:46 JAS415: what does everyone use for GUI stuff in clojure?

19:54 eevar2: swing. or html

20:09 sohail: there used to be jambi but that died

20:09 or became a community project :-)

20:11 Chouser: I'm still hoping those are the same thing.

20:11 jambi is too good to die

20:17 JAS415: Swing has all of this subclassing stuff it looks like, is there an easy way to do that in Clojure?

20:17 or will i have to write java?

20:23 Chouser: JAS415: proxy

20:23 ,(doc proxy)

20:28 JAS415: cool i will check that out, will have to read up on that then :-)

20:49 (psort coll comp)

20:49 (sort comp coll)

20:49 are these really reverses of each other?

21:15 duck1123: so do you guys think it's time to move on past clojure 1.0 in my projects?

21:15 now that contrib no longer compiles on 1.0

21:26 Chouser: nah.

21:28 duck1123: git bisect did it's job perfectly of showing the last commit that compiled. think i should just stick with that one?

21:28 Chouser: just pick a version of contrib that seems to work, test it well and let us know which it is

21:28 duck1123: I'm going to have to adapt to clojure.test-is sooner or later though

21:29 Chouser: that should help whoever finally branches 1.0

21:29 duck1123: 2 revs ago compiles. didn't test

21:30 just ran ant -Dclojure.jar=../clojure/clojure.jar

22:48 justin`: hey does anyone know why I can't accept user input in slime?

22:48 every time I use (flush) no matter what I enter I just stop getting a prompt

22:49 anyone around?

22:56 duck1123: I saw someone mention this before. (it may have been you)

22:56 I don't know what the fix is

23:50 eyeris: Why is (pred x) returning a reference to the function instead of the result of that function?

23:50 http://pastebin.ca/1478013

23:52 That should say "above the if construct"

Logging service provided by n01se.net