11:04 drewr: Does anyone else think WITH-META is misnamed?
11:04 Seems like SET-META or ASSOCM or something else would be more appropriate.
11:05 The WITH-* nomenclature has the connotation of a macro that evaluates a form with certain context.
11:40 Chouser: oh I hadn't thought of that, but now that you mention it, I think I agree.
11:40 except that since metas are often a map that might be misconstrued.
23:22 drewr: Is the @ significant in @traced?
23:29 Ah-ha, yes it is. It's a reader macro for DEREF.
23:42 Chouser: right on!
23:43 sorry. it's late. I shouldn't be speaking.
23:47 in fact, I'm off to bed. g'night
23:47 drewr: Night :-)